This short story appears in the current issue of Nature. You can read it here for a limited time: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v489/n7414/full/489170a.html
Over the summer I visited the Zeppelin Museum in Friedrichshafen, a small town by Lake Constance in Southern Germany. The museum was small but well laid out. I’m not going to discuss here what I saw in there as I use that sort of thing in stories, but it was all interesting stuff. All in all a fascinating visit, marred only at the end by something that is all too common now when visiting technical museums. Something that annoys me more and more, something that reduces me to standing in the middle of some room loudly asking:
Why is there an art exhibition?
Why, every time I visit the a museum showing steam engines, industry, aeroplanes, cars, anything vaguely scientific, do I have to have an art exhibition thrust upon me? Don’t misunderstand me, it’s not that I don’t enjoy art galleries, I have even written about them here on occasion. No, what irritates me is the patronising assumption that whilst I’m looking at a history of how things were made, I also need to be culturally educated in some way by second rate artists who couldn’t get their work displayed anywhere else.
Worse, there will be a sign up explaining to me that there is a link between science and art, and this is going to be demonstrated by some painter’s abstract representation of machinery they probably don’t even understand. This annoys me for two reasons. Firstly, you don’t need an artist to show you the link: the form of just about every machine transcends its function – there is a beauty in the shape of those Zeppelins that is owed to more than just aeronautical design. Why not point that out, rather than forcing me to walk through a selection of badly executed paintings before I rejoin the exhibition I came to see? Secondly, if the link between science and art must be expressed, why, on leaving an exhibition of sculpture or ceramic design, do I never see a small display explaining how the internal combustion engine works? Don’t supposedly arty types need educating too?
I am not arguing for a moment there is no link between science and art. Of course there is, although every so often I hear a report on the TV or radio discussing a new artist who is producing revolutionary work combining the two. Is this supposed to be news? I know lots of people who have been doing just that for years.
Haven’t the BBC heard of Science Fiction?
Alt.Fiction is proud to present its Spring Writing Weekend – the perfect chance for writers of science fiction, fantasy and horror to meet and work with like-minded people and enjoy workshops and talks with established authors in the field. Offering workshops, feedback sessions and expert advice, these weekends are sure to both inform and inspire.
Spring Writing Weekend, 20th-22nd May
Tony Ballantyne – science fiction writer of the Recursion Trilogy and the Penrose Series
Simon Clark – acclaimed horror novelist and author of The Night of the Triffids
Venue: Legacy Chesterfield Hotel, Malkin Street, Chesterfield, S41 7UA
With a convenient location next to Chesterfield rail station and a wide range of leisure facilities, the Legacy Chesterfield Hotel is a great place to work and relax.www.legacy-hotels.co.uk/legacy-chesterfield/
The Spring Writing Weekend costs just £180, including two nights’ shared accommodation, all meals and hot drinks, plus a full programme of writing activities throughout Saturday and Sunday featuring two guest authors.
To book your place, or for any enquiries, email firstname.lastname@example.org or call Alex on 07896 228367
A £90 deposit is required to confirm your place, with a further £90 to be paid at least one week before the event. Deposits are non-refundable except in case of event cancellation. No refunds will be given in case of any changes to guest authors, or in the event of participants being unable to attend for any reason. Please note, the deadline for booking your place is 13 May 2011.
Alt.Fiction is a trading name of Writing East Midlands
I sometimes wonder if I should narrow the focus of this blog. I can’t help think that allowing myself to write about Robots and Accordions gives me too wide a scope and I should instead restrict myself to, for example, only writing about 72 Bass accordions and androids. Or maybe even further, so that I only discuss accordions that are actually being played by robots.
It has never been said that life is like a robot playing the accordion, but then again a lot of things haven’t been said about accordions, and maybe I am the one to say them. After all, there aren’t many people talking about accordions nowadays.
But let’s get to the point.
A friend bought me a CD for Christmas. I won’t name the friend, or the CD, but it was typical of a certain style of music that is popular at the moment, one which contains elements from all kinds of music. A little Jazz, a little folk, baroque harpsichord ostinatos that segue straight into South American rhythms. You probably know the sort of thing I’m talking about. Now, not for a moment would I suggest that people refrain from experimenting with other forms, but I think that there comes a point when you have to commit yourself to something. You can’t really develop a piece if you keep throwing something new in every time you’re struggling for inspiration: you’ve got to work with what you’ve got so far. This is just as true in writing as it is in musical composition.
This, for me, is one of the attractions of good Genre fiction. Immerse yourself in the conventions, and then use them to create something new. It’s not the only way to write, by any means, but it’s a good one.
I’ve never spoken at an event before where they were turning people away at the door… however, I strongly suspect that this enthusiasm was more down to a wish to see Dr Kerstin Dautenhahn‘s robots than anything to do with me.
What an interesting event, too. Organised by Sci-Fi London, and taking place in the Royal Society, the evening began with Dr Dautenhahn giving a twenty minute talk about her own research. Afterwards, Tom Hunter led a discussion contrasting real world and science fictional robots. Dr Dautenhahn was keen to stress that robots were neither he nor she but quite definitely it. Whatever human traits people saw in a robots were those they brought themselves. Contrast this with the general Science Fictional robot which is a human clad in metal. There are exceptions, of course. Asimov made great play of blurring the distinction, and, as Tom Hunter kindly pointed out, I did the same in my own short story “Teaching the War Robot to Dance”.
But back to the real robots…
One of the stars of the show was KASPAR, designed to study human robot interaction. (I had an interesting discussion with a roboticist before the event about the importance of studying how people approach each other. If robots are to be accepted, they can’t simply zoom up behind people) KASPAR has been used to work with children with autism: apparently, the children can find it easier to interact with than real people. The plans for KASPAR are available for anyone to view, you can build a copy for around £1000. I’ve put some pictures of the other robots on my Facebook page.
Oh, and did you know that one of the staircases in the Royal Society was designed by Albert Speer? Honestly. Nazis, autism, robots and Tom Hunter. You don’t get this breadth of coverage on other blogs.